12.18.25
By: Marcy Swisher
Virtual court technology is transforming how communities access justice. Learn how it works, the benefits for communities, and best practices for implementing remote hearings.
When a court summons lands in the mail, many people immediately start calculating the time, cost, and logistics it will take to get there. For someone working hourly, with children to care for, or limited transportation, attending court in person can be a legitimate burden.
Often, that burden doesn’t just affect the individual, but it can also affect their family, their job, and ultimately, their ability to participate.
Now imagine an alternative. Instead of requiring someone to attend in person, you have a remote hearing that they can attend from home or a nearby community center. No travel, no parking, no missed work, and fewer hours out of a person’s life.
For many, that alternative tops just being convenient. It becomes a meaningful solution. That’s why virtual court solutions and remote hearings are gaining momentum across jurisdictions, and why they’re poised to remain a permanent part of modern justice.
The rapid expansion of virtual court technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic helped courts continue to deliver justice while physical courthouses closed. However, the value of virtual hearings extends beyond being a temporary fix during a crisis response. What started as an emergency adaptation has shown lasting potential to reshape access to justice for the better.
Before virtual hearings, many community members faced major barriers to attending court, such as long commutes, lack of childcare, rigid work schedules, or physical limitations.
These barriers often resulted in missed hearings, delayed cases, and sometimes, denial of justice simply because someone could not get to court. With video hearings, these logistical obstacles drop dramatically, opening the door to participation for those who might otherwise be excluded.
Over time, many courts realized that remote proceedings could offer more than just continuity. They could also offer fairness, flexibility, and greater efficiency. Courts saw case backlogs shrink, scheduling become more flexible, and attendance rates improve, especially for civil matters, family court, and hearings involving self-represented individuals.
Today, virtual court solutions are part of a broader wave of legal technology trends. They allow courts to modernize with remote hearing capabilities, integrated case management, digital document submission, and real-time communication—all of which serve both the courts and the communities more effectively.
The advantages of virtual courts ripple outward to individuals and communities in several powerful ways.

In short, virtual court technology not only modernizes bureaucracy but also humanizes access to justice. It transforms hearings from burdensome obligations into accessible services.
While virtual court solutions offer immense benefits to community members, it’s important to note that not all virtual court solutions are created equal. For local governments and court administrators evaluating options, certain features are critical to delivering the best experience for communities.
First and foremost, robust video-conferencing functionality is a must. This includes high-quality audio and video, bandwidth adaptability, and options for participants with limited connectivity.
However, this is just the starting point.
Integration with case-management systems allows filing, document submission, scheduling, and hearing tracking to live in one unified environment. Courts and agencies should look for platforms that support e-filing, digital evidence sharing, secure upload portals, and automated notifications to participants.
Security and privacy must be built in. Encryption, secure data storage, user authentication, and audit-trail capabilities protect sensitive proceedings and help ensure compliance with legal standards. Platforms that meet or exceed judicial security requirements, while remaining accessible, deliver the best balance of trust and convenience.
Accessibility features also matter. The software should support captions, interpreters, or multilingual assistance. It should allow participants to join via desktop, tablet, or smartphone.
For those lacking stable home internet, courts should plan for alternative access, such as community access centers. A comprehensive virtual court platform anticipates real-world disparities and accommodates them.
Finally, usability is key. Interfaces should be intuitive for judges, clerks, attorneys, and litigants alike. Notifications, reminders, and clear instructions for joining hearings help ensure smooth execution, reducing the risk that technical friction becomes a barrier to justice.
As with any technology implementation, rolling out virtual courts doesn’t start and end as soon as you launch the new software. It requires thoughtful procedures and human-focused policies to protect fairness, transparency, and accessibility.
One way to start is by establishing clear guidelines for remote proceedings, which can include how evidence is submitted, how participants verify identity, how attorney-client consultations are handled, and how records are preserved. Transparency with participants about what to expect, including technical requirements, helps build trust from the outset.
Test the workflow before you go live. Conduct mock hearings, involve clerks, judges, and staff, and treat the trial run as real. Confirm that video and audio work under low bandwidth, that screen sharing functions correctly, and that the user interface is navigable even for first-time users.

Offer support and training for all participants. Many residents may not have used virtual court platforms before. It’s important to offer clear and easy-to-understand step-by-step guides, tech-support hotlines, and practice sessions. Providing public access points or community centers with equipment can help bridge gaps for households without reliable internet or hardware.
Encourage flexibility and backup plans. If a participant loses connection, set protocols for rescheduling or switching to audio. Allow for asynchronous document submission where possible. It can also help to build in scheduling buffers, because even though remote hearings may be faster overall, unexpected delays can still arise.
Takes steps to maintain privacy and fairness. For cases that require private counsel-client communication, enable secure breakout rooms. Make sure video setups respect confidentiality. When appropriate, provide hybrid options, like allowing participants to attend either in person or remotely, to preserve litigant choice.
Finally, monitor outcomes. Collect feedback from participants about their experience. Track delays, technical issues, no-shows, and case resolution times. Use that data to refine procedures and improve future hearings.
As promising as virtual court solutions are, they are not a silver bullet. Technology-driven justice must also confront equity challenges, especially the digital divide.
Not all residents have access to high-speed internet, stable devices, or quiet private spaces to attend hearings. For low-income or rural communities, these barriers can make remote participation difficult or impossible. Without mitigation, virtual courts risk excluding the very people they aim to help.
Addressing this requires intentional strategies. This can include providing access at public libraries, community centers, or dedicated court kiosks, offering loaner devices or hotspot lending programs, and ensuring multilingual support, accessibility accommodations, and user guidance for people unfamiliar with digital technology.
Equity also means offering alternatives. Courts that maintain in-person and hybrid options support those who cannot safely or reliably access remote hearings. In this way, virtual solutions enhance, rather than replace, the traditional justice system.
Adopting virtual court solutions offers a rare opportunity for alignment between public service and public benefit. Communities gain broader access to justice, lower barriers to participation, and greater convenience. Courts and government agencies benefit from reduced travel demand, streamlined scheduling, decreased backlog, and improved case flow.
Moreover, virtual hearings, combined with digital filing, integrated case management, and remote communications, modernize the experience of justice. They align legal systems with the pace and expectations of modern life.
Success depends not only on technology, but on execution. A thoughtfully implemented solution, backed by intentional training, policies, and community support, can make remote hearings a reliable, equitable, and permanent feature of court systems.
As technology evolves and communities demand greater convenience and fairness, virtual court solutions offer a path forward. Not every case or hearing belongs online, as certain criminal or high-stakes matters may require in-person proceedings.
However, for many civil matters, family court, status hearings, or administrative cases, remote options offer a service that respects residents’ time, dignity, and obligations.
When courts commit to accessibility and fairness and invest in bridging the digital divide, remote court hearings go beyond being a simple convenience and become a bridge to justice for more people, more often.
Courts that move intentionally toward virtual solutions today are shaping a justice system built for modern life. Now is the time for local governments to address access gaps and design a court experience that meets people where they are.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to this use.